LIFE IS UNCERTAIN SO IS YOUR PROPERTY AFTER DEATH

-

                                LIFE IS UNCERTAIN SO IS YOUR PROPERTY AFTER DEATH

Shubham Budhiraja[1]


Property disputes are inevitable especially when it comes to family matters. There are numerous arrangements through which a person post his death can transfer property to his family or friends concern. There are majorly two methods –

1.       Testamentary – If there is a Will

 

2.       Non-Testamentary – If there is no Will

For Testamentary, the method is where person makes a Will and Codicil. It is a Legal declaration by a person during his lifetime of “his” property in favor of “anyone” as executor in presence of 2 attesting witness signed, dated. Since, it is a legal declaration. Therefore the person making will must be a major person and competent. It is the wish of the testator to whom he executes the will. If there is no executor is named in the Will or if executor renounce or has died or executor is sick and unable to execute then the probate application can be filed by any person to get the appointment of administrator by the court. The role of administrator is same as that of an executor. The probate petition is filed in High Court along with following documents;

-          Copy of will

-          Consent affidavit

-          Affidavit of attesting witness (if alive)

-          Sit map of property

-          Valuation of property

-          3 % court fees

-          Details of legal heirs and their relationship

Thereafter HC serve Notice and citation order made where objections invited. If there are no objections then court will issue probate.

Probate is the certification by court of competent jurisdiction that will is a valid will.

Challenge to probate the will before Writ court or in appeal

-          Signature of testator not verified

-          Will induce by fraud, coercion, etc.

Stages of Will

1.       Drafting of Will

2.       Attestation of Will – 2 witness and signature

3.       Registration of Will- in presence of 2 witnesses, and during lifetime of testator before sub-registrar. Though optional but makes the case more strong if will is registered in mutation records.

4.       Execution of Will – Through probate petition in High Court

 

For Non-testamentary Instruments, if there is no Will then property dispute resolved through succession or partition. There are following ways

 

-          Get the succession certificate: file Petition in district court along-with death certificate, relation of heirs with person died. The purpose of succession certificate is to allow legal heirs to carry on the legal cases on behalf of person died. The succession certificate by no way transfer the property. It merely gives status of successor for purpose of discharging the liabilities or receives interest on behalf of deceased person. The property can be transferred only through a conveyance deed or otherwise but succession certificate create no ownership rights.

 

-          Family relinquishment deed: Through this family members can within themselves agreed to divide the shares and get it registered through sub-registrar. It is the most convenient method.

 

-          Partition suit: This is the last and residuary option to claim share in the property. It is preferable where no right is created in Will by testator or he has get nothing through relinquishment deed.

 

-          Suit for declaration of title on basis of adverse possession

 

Before exercising any of the options, following things are necessary

1.       Electricity bills payment receipts

2.       Death certificate

3.       Water bill payment receipts

4.       Property site map

5.       Valuation of property

Options available to person during his lifetime

1.       Execute a Gift deed

2.       Will

3.       Conveyance deed

Laws governing  

1.       Registration act, 1908

2.       Indian Evidence act, 1872

3.       Indian succession act, 1925

4.       Transfer of property act, 1882


[1] Company Secretary & Final Year Law Student From Faculty of Law, University of Delhi

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

REPUGANCY UNDER ARTICLE 254 & TEST OF VALIDATING LAW

-
Image
  Shubham Budhiraja [1] [1] Company Secretary, LLB Final Year,DU & Bcom (H) The land acquisition falls in concurrent list and parliament in year 2013 has introduced a new act which provides for rehabilitation, compensation and procedure on land acquisition of property. The State of T.N has made 3 different state laws w.r.t. land acquisition which was struck off by the High Court. Thereafter, state of TN in year 2019 enacted the same law but with president assent under Article 254 to avoid the repugnancy with 2013 act under Article 254. The appeal filed before apex court w.r.t. repugnancy of 2019 state law with 2013 central law & test of validating the struck off law. The Supreme Court observed as: VALIDATING A LAW WITH RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT Case Law Relevant Remarks National  Agricultural  Cooperative  Marketing  Federation  of India Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union o...
Read more

Whether a person can be appointed as an arbitrator if his daughter is married to the son of the eldest brother of one of the parties in the arbitration proceedings?

-
Image
    Shubham Budhiraja [1] Two brothers running a family business in the form of a company and dispute arise between them and both decide to resolve through arbitration. During course of arbitration proceedings, one of party filed Section 14(2) r/w Section 15 Petition filed challenging mandate of arbitrator as being terminated because son of arbitrator is married to daughter of eldest brother of one of party and thus should be disqualified under Section 12(5) being ‘close family relationship’. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court declined the relief and held that neither the Seventh Schedule of the A&C Act nor the IBA Guidelines define the expression ‘close family relationship’. The plain language of Entry no. 9 indicates that it is not the legislative intent to render a distant relative of the parties to be ineligible for being appointed as an arbitrator, if both the parties so agree. It is not sufficient that the arbitrator is related to any one of the parties; the relation...
Read more

Whether unstamped agreement to sell executed in the year 1988 can be relied upon in suit for possession?

-
Image
  Whether unstamped agreement to sell executed in the year 1988 can be relied upon in suit for possession?   Under what circumstances, photocopy of agreement to sell can be relied upon as secondary evidence?   Shubham Budhiraja [1]   A filed a suit for possession against B on basis of agreement to sell executed in the year 1989. During the hearing, A filed IA for reading photocopy of agreement to sell as secondary evidence because he is not able to find the original agreement to sell. The Trial Court allowed the IA but in review rejected that because agreement to sell was insufficiently stamped therefore bar of section 35 of stamp act applies. The High Court confirmed the order. The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that bar of Section 35 will not apply because amendment of 1990 wherein explanation was added to the stamp act was substantive in nature and therefore new obligation of stamping cannot be imposed on agreement of sell executed between A and B. [2] ...
Read more