BRIEF ON ARTICLE 370 AND PRESIDENT ORDER DATED 05/08/2019 (BY SHUBHAM BUDHIRAJA)
BRIEF
ON ARTICLE 370 AND PRESIDENT ORDER DATED 05/08/2019
(BY
SHUBHAM BUDHIRAJA)
370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and
Kashmir
(1) Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Constitution,—
(a) the provisions of article 238 shall not
apply now in relation to the state of Jammu and Kashmir;
(b) the power of Parliament to make laws for
the said state shall be limited to—
(i) those matters in the Union List and the Concurrent List which, in consultation with the Government of the State, are declared by
the President to correspond to
matters specified in the Instrument
of Accession governing the accession of the State to the Dominion of India as the matters with respect to which the Dominion
Legislature may make laws for that State; and
(ii) such other matters in the said Lists as,
with the concurrence of the Government of the State, the President may by order
specify.
Explanation: For the purpose of
this article, the Government of the State means the person for the time being
recognized by the President on the recommendation of the Legislative Assembly
of the State as the Sadr-i-Riyasat (now Governor) of Jammu and
Kashmir, acting on the advice of the Council of Ministers of the State for the
time being in office.
(c) the provisions of article 1 and of this
article shall apply in relation to that State;
(d) such of the other provisions of this
Constitution shall apply in relation to that State subject to such exceptions
and modifications as the President may by order specify:
Provided that no such order which relates to
the matters specified in the Instrument of Accession of the State referred to
in paragraph (i) of sub-clause (b) shall be issued except in consultation with
the Government of the State:
Provided further that no such order which
relates to matters other than those referred to in the last preceding proviso
shall be issued except with the concurrence of that Government.
(2) If the concurrence of the Government of the State referred to in
paragraph (ii) of sub-clause (b) of clause (1) or in the second provision to
sub-clause (d) of that clause be given before the Constituent Assembly for the
purpose of framing the Constitution of the State is convened, it shall be
placed before such Assembly for such decision as it may take thereon.
(3) Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this
article, the President may, by public notification, declare that this article
shall cease to be operative or shall be operative only with such exceptions and
modifications and from such date as he may specify:
Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.
Provided that the recommendation of the Constituent Assembly of the State referred to in clause (2) shall be necessary before the President issues such a notification.
ANALYSIS:
Analysis
of Article 370 (1)
Article
370(1) in itself gives overriding effect to constitution of India. However, the
Clause a , b , c and d are worth to look into
in order to understand the true depth of its meaning.
Clause a
states that Article 238 not applicable to the state of J&K
Clause b
provides Power of Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However, Clause
b is not an absolute Provision in itself and clause b(i) and clause b(ii)
require Parliament to get concurrence or consultation of Government of State of
J&K. Thus, it means that the
Parliament is not Powerless to make laws on matters listed in Union list &
concurrent list for State of J&K. However, such a Power is subject to
Concurrence or Consultation of Government of J&K.
Clause c
made Article 1 of constitution of India applicable to State of J&K.
Clause d is
very important to understand. Clause d can be said as residual Power of
Parliament to make laws for state of J&K. However, Clause d is also not an
absolute Provision and subject to two proviso. The Proviso I to clause d make
its reference to Power of Parliament under Clause b (i) and Proviso II seem
like covering the matters other than those of clause b(i).
Analysis of Article 370(2)
Article
370(2) somewhere conclude and repeat the mandate of Article 370(1). It briefly
states that the Concurrence of State of J&K require for giving effect
the Clause b(ii) or 2nd
Proviso to Article 370(1)(d).
Analysis of Article 370(3)
Article
370(3) is key Provision of this Article. It empower the President by order to
either make Entire Article 370 as inoperative or to make it Operative with some
exceptions and modifications. However, again to pass any order under Article
370(3), the recommendation of constitution assembly of state of J&K is
required which is Practically not possible because the constitution assembly
for State of J&K has dissolved long back in 1950.
What Exactly we understood?
So,
the Position is
However,
the Other Articles can be made applicable to state of J&K only by two ways,
1. Through
concurrence/ consultation of Government of J&K – If Subject is of
instrument of accession.
2. Through
only Concurrence of Government of J&K – If Subject is not of instrument of
accession.
So Practically Article 370
cannot be scrapped because Article 370(3) require the President Order on recommendation
of Constitution assembly of J&K which has been dissolved way earlier.
So,
What exactly happened on 05th August 2019 ?
Knowing that the Article
370(3) Order cannot be passed without recommendation of Constitution assembly
of J&K. Thus, the President has passed an order Article 370(1)(d) to amend
Article 367 by adding clause 4 to Article 367.
What
is Article 367 ?
Article 367 is outline
certain guidelines to interpret the constitution of India. Article 367(4) added
by President Order under Article 370(1)(d).
It has added that the:
1.
Any reference made to Government of State of
J&K or Sadar-i-Riyast shall mean a reference to Governor of State of
J&K.
Impact
– The Parliament/ President now would required the consent of governor of state
of J&K instead of earlier requirement of that of Legislative assembly.
2.
Any reference to Constitution assembly under
Article 370(3) shall mean a reference to legislative assembly of J&K.
Impact- President in order to scrap or
to modify Article 370, need the consent of Legislative assembly for State of
J&K. This change has now delete the Practical impossibility to scrap
Article 370 by President Order.
What we understood?
So,
the President has passed an order under Article 370(1)(d) to amend
Article 367 by introducing Article 367(4).
But to apply Article 370(1)(d) , we know that the concurrence of
Government of J&K required.
Since, the State of J&K is under
President rule. Hence, it is deemed that the concurrence of Governor of State
of J&K obtained. So due to President Rule in J&K , it become easier to
dodge away the Concurrence Condition under Article 370(1)(d).
CONCLUSION:
Article
370 is not scrapped since no order has been passed under Article 370(3). However, by virtue of President order under
Article 370(1)(d), the President by amended Article 367 has made the Article
370 as meaningless in indirect way.
Thus,
now the Parliament can make laws for matters as refereed under Article 370 by
more easier and convenient way just by getting consent of Governor of State of
J&K. (earlier which was dependent upon whims & mercies of Legislative
assembly of J&K)
E.g.-
J&K state reorganization bill, 2019 to bifurcate it into UT of J&K with
legislative assembly and UT of Ladakh without Legislative assembly, is evident
of Parliament Power to make laws easier for J&K.
However,
to Scrap the Article 370 in totality, the consent of Legislative assembly of
J&K is still required. (as mandate of Article 370(1)(d)).
DISCLAIMER:
The
views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do
not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any agency of the Indian
government. Examples of analysis performed within this article are only
examples. They should not be utilized in real-world analytic products as they
are based only on very limited and dated open source information. Assumptions
made within the analysis are not reflective of the position of any Indian
government State.
REFERENCES:
The author is company
secretary by qualification and is undergoing its management trainee with a
reputed corporate law firm. Further, he is a Second Year Law student at faculty
of law, University of Delhi. He is also enrolled as Para Legal volunteer with
Delhi State Legal Service authority and also active Participant in Moot Court.
+919654055315
Csshubhambudhiraja1994@gmail.com
Shubhambudhiraja02@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment